manual testing and automation testing
Manual Testing and Automation Testing are two fundamental approaches in the software testing process. Manual Testing involves human testers executing test cases manually without the aid of automation tools, allowing for insights into user experience and exploratory testing through intuitive interaction with the software. It is particularly useful for short-term projects or when testing user interface aspects. In contrast, Automation Testing leverages specialized software tools to execute pre-scripted tests on the application, making it efficient for repetitive tasks, regression testing, and scenarios requiring consistent execution across various environments. While Manual Testing offers flexibility and the human touch, Automation Testing provides speed, accuracy, and the ability to run extensive test suites quickly, making both approaches valuable depending on the project's needs.
To Download Our Brochure: https://www.justacademy.co/download-brochure-for-free
Message us for more information: +91 9987184296
1 - Definition: Manual Testing is the process of manually checking software for defects. The tester takes over the role of an end user and tests the software to find bugs.
2) Human Interaction: Testing is performed by human testers who carefully execute test cases without using automation tools.
3) Test Case Creation: Test cases are often created based on requirements, design documents, or exploratory testing sessions.
4) Exploratory Testing: Manual testing often involves exploratory testing, where testers actively explore the application to find defects not covered by predefined test cases.
5) Cost Effective for Small Applications: It can be more cost effective for smaller projects or applications with limited functionality, where the overhead of automation is not justified.
6) Flexibility: Testers can adapt their testing approach on the fly, modifying test cases based on immediate feedback and observations.
7) Usability Testing: Manual testing is crucial for usability testing, where testers assess the user interface and user experience of the application.
8) No Initial Setup Cost: Manual testing does not require the setup of automation tools, making it more accessible to teams without technical resources.
9) Limited Reusability: Automated test scripts can be reused across different test cycles, whereas manual test cases are often repeated without much improvement.
10) Time Consuming: Manual testing can be time consuming, especially for large projects or regression testing cycles, as all tests must be executed by hand.
11) Skill Intensive: Requires skilled testers who understand the application well and can think outside the box to identify potential issues.
12) Defect Localization: Manual testers can better understand and localize defects through their intuition and human intelligence.
13) Feedback Speed: Testers provide rapid feedback on user experience and functionality, which can be critical during early stages of product development.
14) Limited Coverage: Manual testing can miss some edge cases and repetitive tasks that a human might overlook during testing.
15) Documentation: Often includes creating detailed logs and reports of test cases and bug reports that require meticulous attention to detail.
Browse our course links : https://www.justacademy.co/all-courses
To Join our FREE DEMO Session: Click Here
Contact Us for more info:
Cheapest online iOS training institutes in Vizag
Android App Developer Course in Delhi
I am learning flutter from JustAcademy, They provide very much great environment where people gather and work simultaneously. totally project based training institute.
Awesome Experience. I am a Front-end Web Designer working at Star India for 3 years now. I applied for Full-stack development and my experience has been phenomenal & they really do help with placements exceptionally. Thank you Roshan sir so much.
Flutter app monitoring with Prometheus and Grafana delivers real-time observability by instrumenting the app (via OpenTelemetry or lightweight exporters) to expose metrics that Prometheus scrapes and stores as time-series data. Grafana visualizes those metrics in customizable dashboards and triggers alerts, letting teams track CPU/memory, frame-render times, network latency, error rates and user-impacting regressions. This stack helps quickly detect performance problems, diagnose root causes, and continuously improve app stability and user experience.
Flutter CI with Codemagic is a cloud-first continuous integration and delivery solution that automates building, testing and releasing Flutter apps across iOS, Android and web using configurable workflows (codemagic.yaml), hosted macOS/Linux runners, dependency caching and parallelization. It integrates with GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket, manages code signing and store publishing, runs unit/widget/integration tests, and generates reproducible artifacts so teams catch regressions early and ship reliably. For learners and professionals working on JustAcademy real-time projects, Codemagic removes the overhead of maintaining CI infrastructure, speeds iteration, and provides a repeatable pipeline for demonstrating and delivering polished app releases.
Using Flutter's Hot UI (hot reload and hot restart) lets developers inject code changes into a running app and see updated layouts, styles and behaviours instantly without losing app state, making it ideal for rapid prototyping. This real-time feedback loop accelerates iteration on widgets, animations and responsive designs, improves collaboration between designers and engineers, and dramatically shortens the path from idea to working MVP.
In 2025, pairing Flutter with Supabase vs Firebase means choosing between an open‑source, Postgres‑first backend and a mature Google serverless platform: Supabase gives Flutter apps SQL‑centric workflows, real‑time subscriptions, row‑level security and lower vendor lock‑in with predictable costs and direct SQL access, while Firebase offers Firestore, Auth, Functions, Analytics, polished SDKs, global scaling and turnkey managed features (offline sync, analytics, A/B testing). Both speed cross‑platform development and real‑time experiences; pick Supabase for relational control and openness, or Firebase for convenience and a broader managed ecosystem.
In 2025, Flutter and NativeScript are both mature cross-platform frameworks with different strengths: Flutter (Dart) compiles to native code and provides a rich, cohesive widget-driven UI, excellent performance, and consistent look across mobile, web and desktop, making it ideal for visually complex apps and teams that want a single expressive UI layer; NativeScript (TypeScript/JavaScript) maps directly to native UI components and gives seamless access to platform APIs, appealing to teams with strong JS/TS skills who need native look-and-feel and tight platform integration—choose Flutter for unified UI control and performance, NativeScript for native parity and easier reuse of web/JS expertise.
Flutter CI/CD with GitHub Actions is a complete tutorial-style guide that shows how to automate building, testing, signing, and deploying Flutter apps using GitHub’s workflow runner; it covers creating YAML workflows to run platform-specific builds (Android/iOS), caching dependencies, running unit/widget/integration tests, managing secrets and code signing, generating artifacts, and releasing to stores or distribution channels. By following the tutorial, developers and JustAcademy learners can enforce consistent quality, catch regressions early, speed up delivery of real-time projects, and adopt industry-standard DevOps practices that make app releases reproducible and reliable.
AI-generated UI in Flutter uses machine learning to convert design files or natural-language prompts into responsive Dart widgets, automating layout, styling, accessibility and cross-platform tweaks so prototypes and production-ready screens can be produced far faster with fewer manual edits; this streamlines collaboration between designers and developers, lets teams focus on business logic and performance, and—as models and tooling improve—will become a core part of development workflows, accelerating app delivery and hands-on learning for learners and professionals at JustAcademy.
Optimizing network calls in Flutter with Dio means using Dio’s rich HTTP client features—centralized configuration and interceptors for headers, auth, logging and error handling; request cancellation, timeouts and concurrency control; retry strategies (exponential backoff); and response caching/compression—to reduce latency, save bandwidth and improve reliability. By encapsulating API logic in a configured Dio instance, applying retries and backoff, caching frequent responses, and handling errors consistently, apps become faster, more resilient and easier to maintain—especially important for real-time project work and production-ready certifications like those at JustAcademy.
JustAcademy’s "Deploy Flutter to Firebase: A Step-by-Step Tutorial" is a concise guide that walks you through preparing a Flutter app, configuring Firebase services (Authentication, Firestore, Hosting), and using the Firebase CLI to build and deploy your app—covering both web hosting and integration for Android/iOS where relevant. It explains creating a Firebase project, adding platform-specific Firebase SDKs, adjusting app settings, running production builds, initializing Firebase Hosting, and performing the final deploy, with tips for testing and automating releases via CI/CD. By following the tutorial, developers get a practical, end-to-end workflow to ship scalable, real-time Flutter apps quickly and reliably.
Flutter Desktop keyboard shortcuts let you define and handle platform-consistent key bindings (like Ctrl/Cmd combinations) to trigger app commands without a mouse. Using Flutter’s Shortcuts, Actions, and Intents APIs (or lower-level RawKeyboard events), you map logical key sets to intent objects and implement actions that run when those intents are invoked, while respecting focus and accessibility so shortcuts work predictably across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
